Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Splainer's avatar

> Democrats are in full attack stating they must “codify” Roe. Except, such legislation would still be unconstitutional at the federal level. Trust me, there is no explicit or implicit right to murder a baby in the womb, anywhere, in the document. Something tells me the Founder’s would have written that one down.

The Founders failed to write all sorts of shit into the Constitution; in itself that doesn't make that shit unconstitutional. What SPECIFICALLY makes legislation codifying Roe unconstitutional?

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts